Court & small-claims ready
Identity-verified acknowledgments with an external timestamp are the kind of contemporaneous record a judge or arbitrator accepts: not screenshots reconstructed after the fact.

When you take over a client, or hand one off, both sides need proof of what credentials, configs, and known issues changed hands, and when. Pactbound makes that record tamper-evident and verifiable by anyone, so a clean transition can't come back to bite you.
On- and offboarding are the highest-risk days in the relationship. Without a verifiable handoff record, every later problem becomes a question of your word against theirs.
A real offboarding
When Westbrook IT loses a client to a competitor, the offboarding is supposed to be routine. Forty-three credentials, two firewalls, a backup appliance that's been throwing errors since winter, and a client who's already half out the door and barely returning calls.
Before they revoke a thing, Westbrook sends the incoming provider a Pactbound handoff: every credential, the network docs, and a plain list of what's known-broken, including that failing backup. The new provider opens the link, confirms who they are, and acknowledges each item.
Nobody loves signing off on a failing backup. They do it anyway, because the alternative is pretending they were never told. Now there's a line in the sand: what was handed over, what was disclosed, and who accepted it, fixed to a date neither side can move.
When the client is hit with ransomware that fall and their lawyer goes looking for someone to blame, Westbrook pulls one receipt. The backup was flagged in writing, the new provider acknowledged it, and the transfer was complete and timestamped months before the breach.
Pactbound creates a sealed record containing every credential, config, disclosure, and acknowledgment exchanged during the transition. Anyone can later confirm it is genuine and unchanged, with no Pactbound account and no Pactbound server.
You upload the documentation and disclose what’s known-broken: the failing backup, the unpatched box, the license that lapses next month. The receiving party reviews each item and acknowledges receipt, identity-verified with a one-time code. Every acknowledgment is tied to the specific disclosure it answers.
Under the hood, each item is hashed and a fingerprint of the whole record is anchored on an independent public ledger, so the timestamp holds up even if we disappear. If a client later asks whether a vulnerability was disclosed or whether access was fully transferred, the record gives a verifiable answer. How this stands up in court.
Start with a pre-built template covering the critical sections of a client transition. Add custom disclosures for anything client-specific, and attach the supporting documents and exports.

The MSP community is smaller than it looks, and one botched handoff follows you. A sealed, acknowledged record of exactly what you transferred and what you disclosed turns a he-said-she-said into a closed question.
What you seal
Where the receipt does the work
Identity-verified acknowledgments with an external timestamp are the kind of contemporaneous record a judge or arbitrator accepts: not screenshots reconstructed after the fact.
Export a bundle as PDF and drop it straight into a Stripe, PayPal, or Square dispute: proof of delivery and proof of acceptance in one file.
The receipt is anchored on a public ledger and verifiable with an open-source script. It holds up years later, with or without Pactbound.
Common questions
Free tier includes 5 sign-offs per month. No credit card required.
Start Free