Pactbound
Pactbound · Custom plan

Audit-grade evidence for every fractional CFO engagement.

Built for the work that ends up in front of an external auditor, a board chair, or a diligence team. Seal every material approval, every period-close sign-off, every model version, with named, identity-verified acknowledgment that holds up after the stakeholders change and the questions start.

Independently verifiable by anyone, with nothing reliant on us. Structured to drop straight into PBC lists, control-testing evidence packages, and SOC 2 audit binders. The independent timestamp is the backstop, not the pitch.

A fractional CFO reviewing financial documents and reports: Pactbound seals every material approval with audit-grade evidence.
Why this matters

More for fractional CFOs than for other consultants.

Most consulting deliverables get a soft review and move on. A fractional CFO’s work: period-close approvals, material accrual decisions, board packages, financial models, segregation of duties matrices: gets a hard review, often years later, by external auditors, diligence teams, regulators, or successor finance leadership.

Internal-control frameworks (the COSO framework that backs both PCAOB ICFR audits for public companies and the AICPA’s attest standards for private companies) ask auditors to test whether a control actually operated: not just whether it existed on paper. A material management approval that lives only as a Slack “OK” or a verbal sign-off cannot be tested. Audit-procedure terminology calls this a documentation gap; from the auditor’s perspective, an untestable control is functionally indistinguishable from one that didn’t happen. Pactbound captures the evidence at the moment of the decision: so the auditor never has to ask whether the approval existed, or reconstruct it from email a year later.

For a fractional CFO billing $250–$450/hr with a typical engagement value north of $50k, the math on a $99-and-up Pactbound plan is: one avoided malpractice claim, one cleaner audit, or one faster diligence response pays for the tool for the rest of your career.

Six exposures eliminated

Every one of these is a real claim, control deficiency, or relationship-ending dispute.

Heard repeatedly from fractional CFOs and boutique advisory practices.

No. 01

Your work is going to be audited: by someone who isn't you

When the external auditor arrives, the board hires an interim, or the company gets diligenced for a Series B, every journal entry, accrual decision, and approval you touched gets reviewed. A sealed sign-off at the moment of each material decision turns that review from a scramble into a one-link reply.

No. 02

Material-weakness exposure when there's no paper trail

PCAOB and SSARS 21 frameworks treat undocumented approvals as a control deficiency. Pactbound captures the approver (named, identity-verified), the approval scope, the supporting analysis, and the timestamp: the four things any management-letter review wants to see.

No. 03

Financial models that mutate after delivery

You handed the board the FP&A model in October. By December a department head has edited assumptions and is presenting different numbers as yours. The sealed bundle hashes every cell of the original workbook: the version you delivered is provably distinct from the version they're showing now.

No. 04

When the board changes and decisions get re-litigated

A new board chair arrives, questions an accrual decision from a prior quarter, asks why the CFO signed off. The sealed acknowledgment from the original CEO, dated and externally timestamped, settles it without re-opening the audit work.

No. 05

SOC 2 / ISO 27001 control evidence for client compliance audits

If your clients are pursuing SOC 2 or ISO 27001, their auditors will ask for evidence of CFO-approved controls (segregation of duties, journal-entry approval workflows, vendor payment authorization). A Pactbound receipt drops directly into the control-testing evidence package.

No. 06

Engagement-letter and scope creep on retainer work

Fractional means “not all of it.” When the founder treats you as the full finance team and the engagement-letter scope quietly expands, sealed monthly sign-offs documenting exactly what you owned that period are the difference between a clean wind-down and a malpractice exposure.

A real diligence story

What do I show a diligence team questioning financial decisions I made eight months ago?

Elena had wrapped an 18-month fractional CFO engagement with a Series A SaaS company in February. In October the company entered a Series B process. The lead investor's diligence team flagged a revenue recognition policy change she'd implemented eight months earlier, and wanted to know who approved it and whether the board had been told.

Elena had sealed that policy change as a Pactbound bundle: the analysis, the technical memo, and the board chair's named acknowledgment, timestamped the day the board packet went out. The diligence team got a single link.

The policy was still questioned, but the review took two hours instead of two weeks. Her engagement had ended months earlier, and she didn't reconstruct anything from memory or email. The sealed record answered every question they had about who approved it and what they saw.

The Series B closed. The following month the founder referred Elena to two other portfolio companies.

PBSendernotified on sign-off.pactboundSHA-256 · MerkleSealed bundleRecipients sign offAnchored on Hedera hashgraphindependently verifiable timestamptopic 0.0.XXXXXXX · seq XX

Where the receipt earns its keep

Use it at every sign-off moment in a fractional engagement.

  • 01Engagement letters + scope-of-services
  • 02Monthly close sign-offs
  • 03Material journal-entry approvals
  • 04Board package delivery + acknowledgment
  • 05FP&A model versions (locked to date)
  • 06Audit-readiness packages
  • 07Cap-table and equity-event approvals
  • 08Vendor contract review sign-offs
  • 09Period-end management reporting
  • 10Year-end tax-prep handoff to CPA

Common questions

What fractional CFOs ask before their first engagement seal

What do I show a diligence team questioning financial decisions I made eight months ago?
A sealed Pactbound bundle for each material decision: the supporting analysis, the approval scope, and a named, identity-verified acknowledgment from the CEO or board chair who signed off. Diligence teams usually aren't questioning your methodology. They're confirming who approved it and when, and the bundle answers both in one link.
Does Pactbound produce evidence an auditor will actually accept?
Auditors test whether a control 'actually operated.' An independently verifiable, externally timestamped record with a named approver is testable evidence. A Slack 'ok' or verbal sign-off isn't. The bundle is structured to drop directly into PBC lists and control-testing evidence packages.
What if a client later says I exceeded my scope on a fractional engagement?
Sealed monthly sign-offs documenting exactly what you owned that period are your protection. If the engagement letter said 'monthly close and board reporting' and the founder gradually added treasury, AP, and FP&A over eight months, those expansions either appear in sealed scope-confirmation bundles or they don't. If they don't, that absence is your defense.
Can Pactbound bundles be used in a formal audit or investigation?
Yes. Every bundle is independently verifiable without a Pactbound account. The file hashes, the acknowledgment chain, and the timestamp all check out against the public ledger the bundle is anchored to. A forensic investigator or auditor can confirm the record is genuine without relying on anything Pactbound controls, or on us still being in business.

Custom plan

Built for the audit.

Includes everything in Team plus unlimited sign-offs, role-based access for engagement teams, data retention set to your policy, and dedicated support.

Pricing depends on engagement count, retention requirements, and whether your clients require specific compliance attestations.